Construction disputes rarely begin with one dramatic event. More often, they build quietly from unclear schedules, delayed information flow, and early project assumptions that were never properly defined.

Alberta’s proposed Bill 30 introduces a fixed 120 day approval framework for major projects, reshaping how construction projects are planned, financed, and delivered. While the legislation promises greater certainty and faster approvals, it also creates new pressures around complete submissions, risk allocation, and dispute exposure across the construction industry.

Construction law in 2025 became faster, firmer, and far less forgiving. Courts across Canada consistently reinforced that missed deadlines, delayed responses, and “sorting it out later” are no longer viable strategies.

From stricter lien timelines to immediate enforcement of adjudication decisions and heightened risks when insolvency enters the picture, the message was clear. Preparedness and early action are now critical to protecting cash flow, leverage, and project stability as the industry moves into 2026.

In Round Hill Consulting Ltd v Parkview Consulting Ltd, the Alberta Court of Appeal signaled a more practical approach to applying Alberta’s “drop-dead” rule. Rather than focusing on rigid procedural tests, the Court emphasized substance over form, asking whether steps taken meaningfully advanced the overall dispute.

For construction litigants managing intertwined claims and counterclaims, the decision offers greater flexibility, but also reinforces the importance of showing real, documented progress toward resolution, not just procedural activity.

Prompt Payment coming to BC